Analysis of Village of Deerfield v. Illinois Workers Compensation Commission, 2014 Ill. App (2d) 131202WC (2014)By Stephen G. BaimeApril 2015If one sustains two injuries on two separate dates to two different parts of the body and consolidates the claims for trial, he can collect a percentage of a person on one and a wage differential on the second one even if the part of the body in the second case could have resulted in a person as a whole award.
Calculation of AWWBy Lindsey BeukemaFebruary 2015In R & D Thiel, A Division of Carpenter Contractors of America v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Comm’n, the Court issued a Rule 23 Order addressing the calculation of average weekly wage using the second method of Section 10.
Can you withdraw your consent to depose a witness? How can you cite a Commission decision as precedent at the appellate court level?By Peter Corti & Megan KivistoApril 2015It is still not a good idea to cite Commission decisions to the appellate court. However, when faced with an argument that there is “no case law” on an issue when there actually is, you can present it in such a manner to show that, while you are certainly well aware that the unrelated Commission decision has no precedential effect at the appellate level, the Act dictates that it did have precedential effect before the Commission.
Case analysis of Di Benedetto v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation 2015 IL App (1st) 133233WCBy Matteo RagoDecember 2015In DiBenedetto, the court focused on the issue of what date should be utilized in determining the commencement of a wage-differential benefit: Is it the date of claimant’s accidental injury or the date of the arbitration hearing? The court also addressed the maximum weekly benefit allowable under Section 8(b)(4) of the Act.
Circuit court has jurisdiction to resolve disputes involving attorney referral agreementsBy Shuaib AhmedApril 2015In Ferris, Thompson and Zweig, Ltd. v. Esposito, the Illinois Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the Legislature intended to divest the Circuit Court jurisdiction and confer original jurisdiction on the Commission to resolve a dispute based on a referral agreement apportioning attorney fees earned in a claim filed under the Workers’ Compensation Act.
How inclusive is the exclusive remedy?By Anita M. DeCarloSeptember 2015In Dominique Kay v. Centegra Health System, the Court found plaintiff did not have the right to pursue a negligence case based upon the exclusive remedy provision found in Section 5(a) of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act.
Independent truck driver vs. employeeBy Kenneth F. WertsSeptember 2015An examination of Steel & Machinery Transport, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Commission.
PPG Industries: When are job duties irrelevant?By Joseph K. GuyetteFebruary 2015In PPG Industries v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, the Respondent argued that evidence of the Petitioner’s job duties should be considered irrelevant when that evidence is over three years old. While the appellate court rejected that argument, it left open the possibility that older evidence of a Petitioner’s work duties may be admissible at trial.
When do you qualify as a traveling employee?By Robert J. FinleySeptember 2015The traveling employee case generally presents an uncertain path to benefits due to the fact-specific nature of the inquiry.