An analysis of In re Estate of Arnold Rexroad Sr.By Michelle D. PorroSeptember 2018The appellate court looked at whether a workers’ compensation carrier's misconduct can result in a forfeiture of their right to recovery under Section 5(b) of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act in In re Estate of Arnold Rexroad Sr.
Appellate court determines when nine percent judgment interest can and cannot be awardedBy Sandra K. LoebJuly 2018The appellate court determined that the proper interest rate to use for calculation of a final payment of a Commission award after judicial review proceedings is the interest rate set forth in the arbitrator’s decision in Dobbs Tire & Auto v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission.
Attorney fees and quantum meruitBy Erin M. SieversMay 2018The appellate court's recent decision in Abel Ponce v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission addresses the apportioning of attorneys’ fees between a law firm originally hired by the claimant and the successor law firm.
Commission interpretations of medical issues in the absence of an expert opinionBy Richard D. HanniganMay 2018The appellate court on numerous occasions has indicated that it will rely on the Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission’s expertise when it comes to medical issues. However, the Commission may not interpret an MRI when that interpretation is not supported by a medical expert's opinion.
The difference between causal connection and maximum medical improvementBy Stephen G. BaimeMay 2018The appellate court's decision in Tequila Smith vs. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n explains how to apply the rule of law to the facts when considering causal connection and maximum medical improvement.
The dreaded intervening actBy Michael RomSeptember 2018Gina Catalanellov. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission provides a good primer on how to both defend against claims of intervening acts and what is needed to pursue them as a defense.
Editor’s noteBy Richard D. HanniganSeptember 2018An introduction to the issue from the newsletter editor, Richard D. Hannigan.
Editor’s noteBy Richard D. HanniganJuly 2018An introduction to the issue from Rich Hannigan.
Editor’s noteBy Richard D. HanniganMay 2018
An introduction to the issue from Rich Hannigan.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganDecember 2018An introduction to the issue from the newsletter editor, Richard D. Hannigan.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganJanuary 2018An introduction to the issue from Editor Rich Hannigan.
Legislative updateBy Michael RomSeptember 2018A summary of SB 1737 and SB 904, both of which were amendatorily vetoed by Governor Bruce Rauner last month.
Negotiated rates and third-party carriersBy Markham M. Jeep & Graham J. JeepMay 2018The appellate court ruled in Perez v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission that the negotiated rate — the calculation of a dollar amount owed for medical services — is not limited to a rate negotiated by the employer or the employer’s insurance carrier.
A petitioner injured on the job with an uninsured employerBy Gina T. PanepintoDecember 2018The Injured Workers’ Benefit Fund pays workers’ compensation benefits to Illinois workers whose employers have failed to provide insurance coverage as required by law and have failed to pay the benefits owed to them.
Proving a wage loss differentialBy Monica J. KiehlMay 2018Sysco Food Service of Chicago v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission underscores not only how much deference the circuit court is required to give the Commission’s determination regarding factual findings, but also how difficult it is to overcome the manifest weight of the evidence standard.
Rule 23 Order reverses Commission, gives primer on neutral risk analysisBy Gina PanepintoJuly 2018The reversal of the Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission's decision in Nadine Rund v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission shows that injuries arising out of neutral risks, if performed in the course of employment more frequently than the general public, do arise out of employment and are compensable.